Pray about these random sins in our midst.
Perversion. Did you read this? I just wanna vomit! Sister Elizabeth Hurley, a British actress of some note, is currently filming a movie with a nasty subject matter. It is referred to as an “erotic thriller,” so I CLEARLY will not be seeing it. First of all, Sister Hurley Girley will be involved in an intimate scene of perversion with another woman. Second of all, the story was written by her SON, clearly a pervert. And to take the perversion once step further, said perverted offspring is DIRECTING the movie. So when Sister Liz is quoted in the media as saying how “liberating” she felt in the sex scenes because her son was directing and she felt “safe and looked after,” I came unglued! Let me add that her son is only 21 years old. Look, I don’t know the full topic of this film, but I’m going to assume it deals with mystery and intrigue in the life of Sigmund Freud or Medusa!
Purloining. I have no proof that this story involves sodomites or not, but it would seem so on the surface. Years ago in 2005, a verified original of the ruby slippers worn in THE WIZARD OF OZ were purloined from a “museum” in Michigan. Stolen. Display case shattered and everything! Who in the world would want to steal such an item and why? There is nary a real ruby on those trashy shoes other than ruby-colored sequins glued on by some costumer at Warner Brothers in the 30s. Here’s where my sodomite theory comes in. These shoes were worn by a homosecular icon, Judy Garland. Her still living fans are known to be a bit fanatical. The shoes were not recovered until 2018 when it was discovered that they were stolen by two MEN of a certain age. Then, the shoes were returned to the MAN of a certain age who had originally displayed them. Follow me? What I find really surprising is that the Michigan Museum Man is now entrusting them to an auction house to take on a display tour before auctioning off to the highest bidder. Sister Garland must be looking down on all of this exclaiming how MARVELOUS it all is!
Posting. As a pure Babatist and having never been in any sort of legal trouble involving prison time, I am only peripherally familiar with the concept of having to post bond to stay out of jail during a legal proceeding. I also have no idea how the amount of money assigned to said bond is assessed in each case. And while I’ve seen seedy bond offices dotting the landscape surrounding most jails, I know not what goes on therein. So……I’m really not speaking in an official capacity in this opinion. But if a criminal is indicted for a crime and is required to post half a billion dollars’ bond, I figure the crime is serious. THEN, when the bond is assessed on someone who claims to be filthy rich and then they can’t pay or post the bond, NOR will any shifty bondsman help them out, something just doesn’t add up. It seems to me that lying about one’s fiscal security becomes an additional charge in the indictment, making said criminal a LIAR! What is this world coming to? I’m just grateful that we’ve never had any crooks in public office. Let us pray.
